On 22 February 2010 22:15, CT' <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been following the Kexi project for a few weeks now and had > intended to attempt an installation of it. Today I discovered that > first, it's not a precompiled package for Mac. That's a major strike > against it. Then I find the FINK project that you do have a package > for requires a witch doctor, voo doo dolls, and some heavy chanting to > get it to install under Mac OS X 10.6. > > I'm not a programmer, though i do frequently use Linux. The effort > involved to even try your product under Mac OS X is a major deterrent > even for me, let alone people who don't use Linux nor code software. > > What can I do to encourage the development of precompiled Mac OS X > versions of Kexi? As a systems administrator, I can occasionally make > available (via the Internet) a variety of Mac OS X systems, but I > would need to know how you'd need them configured.
Hi To paraphrase this question we can ask: what we can do to encourage more people for KDE/Mac contributions. There are few open source developers, and even fewer have access to macs (modern enough at least). I think the answer could be: talk about the need, spread the word about Kexi. It's good that you're apparently accustomed with the Linux version. The issues you talk about are related to software packaging on Mac, isn't quite Kexi specific. I do not what exact issues you mean though. Usability? Regarding to the installation differences... KDE software is modular, so there're packages needed that share common components, otherwise you'll end up with apps taking too much space in you memory... -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & KOffice (http://www.kexi-project.org, http://www.koffice.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (http://windows.kde.org) _______________________________________________ Kexi mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kexi
