Jeffrey Altman via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ""Christopher D. Clausen" via RT" wrote: >> I would assume that it is possible to check the version number of >> Kerberos.dll and make sure it is equal to or newer than the version >> in the KB article. > > Not a safe assumption either. The Vista SP1 Beta 1 kerberos.dll has > a later version number than the hotfix. You need to know what is in > each version.
Hmm... would it be better to maintain a list of known bad versions? <<CDC _______________________________________________ kfwdev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kfwdev
