On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:47:58PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > Then all of our stuff should be #ifdef KGDB; while merging from 2.6.12 > > to 2.6.13 I recall it noticing a few of the #ifdef KGDB's had been > > removed. > > Yes, there really shouldn't be any #ifdef KGDB's in the kernel tree and > we're down to very few[1] and I think it's really just one in the end > we'll need.
That was __might_sleep()? I'm still dubious about that one. It might be possible to just change the caller. Do you have a full backtrace for it? I suppose you're doing a *_user in kgdb somewhere, right? -Andi _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
