Jason Wessel wrote: [Thu May 10 2007, 12:29:32PM EDT] > Bob Picco wrote: > > Jason Wessel wrote: [Thu May 10 2007, 12:01:13PM EDT] > > > > Nope. I thought our plan is to introduce hardware breakpoint support later > > to > > mainline? If that's the case, I believe generally it is frowned upon to > > submit > > code which isn't enabled. Perhap my interpretation of our plan is incorrect. > > > Bob, > > I plan submit everything that actually works. On IA32 HW breakpoints > appear to work at this point, if we do not get these features submitted > they will not likely gain acceptance. If it is the case that the > mainline folks say remove it before I can accept it, then at that time > I'd remove it. Or if I am told to break it out into a separate patch, > that is fine too. > > Given that objective would you like me to apply or not apply your > patches? Because I have no IA64 hardware, I have no way to test if they > work or not. Jason,
okay. I still want ia64 hardware breakpoint support removed (3rd patch). I haven't tested it in a couple years. Also it adds code to ivt.S which needs to be improved. > > Jason. bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
