On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:23 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> This patch series is a request for comments on several levels.
>
> 1) Do people find kdb useful? (See * and **)
> 2) Would kdb folks be willing to use it if it was a front end to kgdb?
> 3) Does kdb have a future in the mainline kernel?
> 4) Is this a reasonable approach to have some level of
> unification to end up with a more robust kernel debugger?
>
> * This is not meant to be a religious war
>
I am just a ordinary user of linux, but I want to say that I enjoyed the
kdb back when I used it. I really would like to see that in kernel.
But it would be even better to see a kdb over ethernet first (I have no
serial port in my notebook....)
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
