On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 05:55 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> The remainder was a port from the original kdb, and should not been
> needed.  The preempt_disable and preempt_enable should be able to be
> safely called while the system in the kgdb exception context, so this
> chunk of code is going to get axed and re-tested.

Ok, thanks!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to