Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 08:30:04AM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote: > >> That being said, you patch works for the purpose of catching the >> exception and returning with or without the addition of an earlier >> return before bust_spinlocks() which I had proposed. >> > > So does that mean I can have an acked-by for the patch? > Absolutely.
Jason. Acked-by: Jason Wessel <[email protected]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
