On 03/20/2012 06:18 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 20-03-2012 5:00, Jason Wessel wrote: > >>> An arch-independent hook has its advantages, no question. Maybe we >>> should just start this way and then evolved on top as needed. >> Sounds good to me. I added the reboot notifier patch into the merge queue >> for kgdb/kdb. >>> I was wondering why those other archs do not use the notifier. Maybe one >>> motivation is to avoid that too much code is excluded from the debugger >>> by detaching too early. Could possibly be addressed by making >>> detach-on-reboot runtime configurable. >> There really isn't a whole lot of code between reboot hook invoked from >> kernel_restart_prepare(), >> and the place where the reset is invoked. Specifically it looked like: >> usermodehelper_disable(); >> device_shutdown(); >> syscore_shutdown(); >> machine_restart(cmd); >> Attached is the patch you asked for the conditional behavior with respect to >> the reboot hook. > You forgot to attach it?
Source Forge [kgdb mailling list] is eating attachments. I had definitely attached it. See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/19/735 I also included this patch in the potential merge queue as patch 5 of 5, sent to the kgdb mailing list. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29008292 Jason. Jason. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
