On Wed 2020-05-13 19:04:48, Sumit Garg wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 19:55, Daniel Thompson > <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:18:34PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > > Since commit 42a0bb3f7138 ("printk/nmi: generic solution for safe printk > > > in NMI"), kgdb entry in NMI context defaults to use safe NMI printk() > > > > I didn't see the author on Cc: nor any of the folks whose hands it > > passed through. It would definitely be good to involve them in this > > discussion. > > > > Thanks for updating the Cc: list. > > > > > > which involves CPU specific buffers and deferred printk() until exit from > > > NMI context. > > > > > > But kgdb being a stop-the-world debugger, we don't want to defer printk() > > > especially backtrace on corresponding CPUs. So instead switch to normal > > > printk() mode in kgdb_cpu_enter() if entry is in NMI context. > > > > So, firstly I should *definitely* take a mea cupla for not shouting > > about this at the time (I was on Cc:... twice). Only thing I can say > > confidently is that the test suite didn't yell about this and so I > > didn't look at this as closely as I should have done (and that it > > didn't yell is mostly because I'm still building out the test suite > > coverage). > > > > Anyhow... > > > > This feels a little like we are smearing the printk() interception logic > > across the kernel in ways that make things hard to read. If we accepted > > this patch we then have, the new NMI interception logic, the old kdb > > interception logic and some hacks in the kgdb trap handler to defang the > > NMI interception logic and force the kdb logic to kick in. > > > > Wouldn't it be better to migrate kdb interception logic up a couple of > > levels so that it continues to function even when we are in nmi printk > > mode. That way *all* the printk() interception code would end up in > > one place. > > > > Yes it would be better to have all printk() interception code at one > place. Let me see if I can come up with an integrated logic.
It might be enough to move the kdb_check from vprintk_default() to vprintk_func(). I have never used kdb. I did not know that it was able to stop kernel in any context. Would this work? It is only compile tested! >From 14ae6c9f0cbd1479cb898c864c7ab46e20f3cf6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:37:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] printk/kdb: Redirect printk messages into kdb in any context kdb is able to stop kernel even in NMI context where printk() is redirected to the printk_safe() lockless variant. Move the check and redirect to kdb even in this case. Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> --- kernel/printk/printk.c | 14 +------------- kernel/printk/printk_safe.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c index 9a9b6156270b..63a1aa377cd9 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ #include <linux/memblock.h> #include <linux/syscalls.h> #include <linux/crash_core.h> -#include <linux/kdb.h> #include <linux/ratelimit.h> #include <linux/kmsg_dump.h> #include <linux/syslog.h> @@ -2036,18 +2035,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vprintk); int vprintk_default(const char *fmt, va_list args) { - int r; - -#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB - /* Allow to pass printk() to kdb but avoid a recursion. */ - if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk && kdb_printf_cpu < 0)) { - r = vkdb_printf(KDB_MSGSRC_PRINTK, fmt, args); - return r; - } -#endif - r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT, NULL, 0, fmt, args); - - return r; + return vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT, NULL, 0, fmt, args); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vprintk_default); diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c index d9a659a686f3..81734497c625 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include <linux/preempt.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/debug_locks.h> +#include <linux/kdb.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/irq_work.h> @@ -359,6 +360,13 @@ void __printk_safe_exit(void) __printf(1, 0) int vprintk_func(const char *fmt, va_list args) { +#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB + /* Allow to pass printk() to kdb but avoid a recursion. */ + if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk && kdb_printf_cpu < 0)) { + return vkdb_printf(KDB_MSGSRC_PRINTK, fmt, args); + } +#endif + /* * Try to use the main logbuf even in NMI. But avoid calling console * drivers that might have their own locks. -- 2.26.1 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport