On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:07:09PM +0800, Stephen Zhang wrote: > There are several common patterns. > > 0: > kdb_printf("...",...); > > which is the normal one. > > 1: > kdb_printf("%s: "...,__func__,...) > > We could improve '1' to this : > > #define kdb_func_printf(format, args...) \ > kdb_printf("%s: " format, __func__, ## args) > > 2: > if(KDB_DEBUG(AR)) > kdb_printf("%s "...,__func__,...); > > We could improve '2' to this : > #define kdb_dbg_printf(mask, format, args...) \ > do { \ > if (KDB_DEBUG(mask)) \ > kdb_func_printf(format, ## > args); \
This line is picked up by checkpatch as being overlong. > } while (0) > > In additon, we changed the format code of size_t to %zu. Should be `addition`. > Signed-off-by: Stephen Zhang <stephenzhang...@gmail.com> It is arguable that there should be a Reviewed-by: from Doug here... although given the big changes in v3 I don't think you were wrong to drop it. Nevertheless... given the implicit R-b ("when Daniel merges") in Doug's comments on v3 I decided to reinstate it. No action needed from you on this. I have fixed up all these issues when I applied the patch. Thanks! Daniel. _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport