On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 05:05:46PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:04 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > Use %ptTs instead of open-coded variant to print contents > > of time64_t type in human readable form. > > > > Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wes...@windriver.com> > > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> > > Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 9 +-------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > I kinda doubt anyone would really care if we just switched kdb to just > the old "%ptT". Probably no machines are parsing this string.
Formally it's an ABI. > ...but in any case, now that the nifty new format is there we might as > well use it. Thus: > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
