On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:03 PM Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Side note: we do need *some* way to do it.
Ooh.
This patch is a work of art.
And I mean that in the worst possible way.
We can do
typeof(pos) pos
in the 'for ()' loop, and never use __iter at all.
That means that inside the for-loop, we use a _different_ 'pos' than outside.
And then the compiler will not see some "might be uninitialized", but
the outer 'pos' *will* be uninitialized.
Unless, of course, the outer 'pos' had that pointless explicit initializer.
Here - can somebody poke holes in this "work of art" patch?
Linus
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
