-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> Is it just me or are DFN8-M065 <-> TDFN8-M065 and DFN10-M05 <-> >> TDFN10-M05 packages identical except that TDFN's have slightly larger >> pads? > > Very likely - my DFN/QFN lib is based on datasheets > from topline.to (they make dummy components). > > I've seen several variations in identical packages, when > comparing datasheets from different manufacturers, so > appropriate values must in some cases be guesstimated :-( > For 3D packages, it's not that critical. For footprints, I would go with the more conservative values, such as the larger pads.
I like maxim's documentation because it's complete, and quite conservative, and the components they make seem to always conform to specs, unline some other manufacturers. > In some cases, I've even resorted to measuring on actual > components that I happen to have laying around ... > Ouch! You need a pretty good caliper to measure something that small. > Also, some datasheets specifies min+max, and others only > the nominal size - I've chosen nominal (almost ?) everywhere. Nominal is fine, IMO. Nominal is a manufacturer's way of saying "it's how it should look, but we can't get it that exact". Alex -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMdn0QAAoJEOYeVCFxnjTc6ZgH/1y6FB811oQaTx1bX6DIjYDF BB6gOUscVbJd1EFrcRPh2vA5Q8ZotQLUtomjR6GdWMDxDZjOPI0h9OsYt7EGxjZn JogVyj/2ysSwUT1Cz6Sl4jQvwIq2Zi25QkBDwhgQLXgThspMHv2kuEeT6bcN6ynR RW0yPHDAA9GCI3rgd4/qcw77VP0PP0tE2rSBxQskpILotjNg67oqOQfgfk3K011P 9sPdcl6qerne+0vpWsPgtDm3iILr+c1pAIs4pRwKMvm6RGtVAJCe+StBAlV0qt6d E4HqJzibAtOLD2/FJrAFk+/LNkHL3KxBVj+TR3WSppCqbzLT1/TwDD+DQJgNjqg= =IceQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

