On 04/06/2011 12:33 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 4/6/2011 1:15 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: >> Le 06/04/2011 18:43, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : >>> On 04/06/2011 11:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>>> On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>>>> So did we go back and fix the zoom steps? I remember one step was >>>>> commented >>>>> out: 0.7. >>>>> >>>>> It needs to be enabled now, and absolutely so on Linux. >>>> Currently on Linux, if you start eeschema without loading a schematic, the >>>> sheet border is off screen on top and bottom, suggesting the initial zoom >>>> is >>>> not optimal for viewing the border. >>>> >>>> Is this intentional? >>> It happens in any loading of a schematic, and any sheet change within a >>> schematic also, and therefore cannot be intentional. >>> >> I do not have this problem. >> Is it a recent issue (BestZoom() was slightly modified in eeschema to fix >> issue >> for zoom = 0.7) ? >> > I have the same problem as well when the aspect ratio of the drawing window is > not close to that of the schematic page size. If wxWidgets 2.9 takes care of > the non-integer zoom sizes and the problem doesn't exist on Linux or OSX, why > not revert to the old behavior of best zoom and put 0.7 back into the zoom > list > if we are going to make wxWidget 2.9 a build requirement on windows?
Exactly. Do you know this NOT to be the case at this moment? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
