On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 05:39:02PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Was that a request for help?
That was a bug report. Last time I encountered it Jean-Pierre asked for the board so I attached it. > You call me a broken record and a tyrant within in a span of two days and > then don't know > how to ask for help. Put yourself in a box did you? "Tyrant" was for fun. Broken record was for real... > Please help test the attached patch on Linux. > The "double" was not good enough, "long double" is working better so far. Uhm... the suspect was something like that in fact... shouldn't be better a solution not involving floating point? We could simply format as an integer and then insert the decimal point in the right place, that shouldn't be too complex. > If it works, I will work on the Mingw solution tomorrow, but I gotta run now. Why are there issues on mingw for that? Isn't long double 80 bit on both or its printf doesn't support long doubles? > My testing strategy was to simply compile for nanometers, load you nanometer > board, and > save it under another name, then use diff on the two files. Seems reasonable. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
