Hi All involved in scripting :-) I am a scripting-sceptic, but must say amazing progress is being made. Perhaps I will become a script-kiddy at my age :-)
Thanks! /Martijn On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:33:24AM +0200, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: >> I keep reading and thinking. >> >> And one idea comes to my mind: >> >> Why don't we do those checks on the python side, but, with one >> restriction (to cut out the maintenance drawback): have the MAX_VALUE >> / MIN_VALUE for every enum in C++, example: > > I see no problem with that, many of them already behave this way... > Often there is the -1 as unspecified/invalid marker. Other enums > starts at 0 (since it's the default behaviour for enums and there is no > reason to choose otherwise). > > For example: UNDEFINED_LAYER = -1, LAYER_COUNT = 32 > for color we have UNSPECIFIED = -1 and LAST_COLOR (last time I looked > was 24...) > > Bitmasked enum are not a problem (since these are inherently used at the > bit level), other critical stuff will be handled in a case-by-case > fashion (I didn't see much funky stuff in there) > > This would be plan 3b (facade but only for strange stuff XD) > > -- > Lorenzo Marcantonio > Logos Srl > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
