On 11/15/2012 10:57 AM, Alex G. wrote: > Not to be the harbinger of evil, but isn't that supposed to be > "-std=c++11" ? > > "-std=c++0x" was some half brainfarted, transitional flag, that never > really worked well. Once the C++ 2011 standard was officially released, > we got the newer "-std=c++11". > Not sure if there should be any difference, but my 2 cents tell me to > use '-std=c++11". > > Alex
The goal was to get a general hashtable support, not limited to the wxString crap. Yes, wxString is crap IMO. That goal seems to have been achieved now without any special command line option via boost/unordered, see hashtable.h If it is not working on all the various gcc compilers, then your suggesting is worth considering, as is an upgrade to boost. However I think we should be through the woods now, the only new code over last week is the boost hashtable incorporation, and this, using the same command line options as before. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
