On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > anyway I find more useful a full model output (with all shapes) than bounding > boxes :)
Then you *really* have a lot of memory and processor time to handle you designs :D (alternatively you don't need complex designs). Boundary models are also used for airflow calculation models, BTW. Really there is usually (if not ever) no advantage in having a pin-by-pin model of a QFP or something (except eye candy, maybe) IGES is not 'easy' (it's a little easier maybe, in respect to STEP) but at least is a) stable (STEP is not actually finished yet) and b) fully and freely documented. The fact that c) is AFAIK still required for some goverment work should ensure that it won't go away in a short time... -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
