On Aug 31, 2013 8:24 PM, "Dick Hollenbeck" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Aug 31, 2013 5:40 PM, "Brian Sidebotham" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 31 August 2013 22:06, Dick Hollenbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > I just upgraded to openssl 1.0.1e, and am now building the DLL fine in a-mingw-us, > >> > although I think this 'e' version had nothing to do with this. Seems the Configure script > >> > is picky about sequence of arguments. > >> > > >> > > >> > We now need to package the openssl DLL goodies so they can flow into a situation where > >> > windows builders of GITHUB_PLUGIN can use those. > >> > > >> > >> Come to think of it, I don't know how I am going to find the openssl headers on Windows > >> for the GITHUB plugin. Certainly we cannot expect them to flow with a KiCad installation. > >> > >> Maybe we will simply need to reproduce the ExternalProject_Add() in the GITHUB plugin > >> CMakeFile, conditioned on Windows. Gosh yes, what was I thinking? > >> > >> > >> How you guys stay on Windows is beyond me. The package management concept has long been > >> an established concept. But "add/remove programs" is a joke by comparison. > >> > >> > >> Then, you have competing C++ compilers so the story would have be told in duplicate > >> anyways. I don't expect MSVC to be around much longer, given that it does not generate > >> revenue (not like the Android patent blackmailing is). And Android is showing up > >> everywhere now, including wrist watches. I give MSVC about another 6 years max. > >> > >> > >> How good can that be for your character, knowing that most of your revenue is coming from > >> patent blackmail? Maybe Mr. B is retiring because of that. (Note I am assuming he has > >> that much quality of character.) > >> > >> You hear that New Zealand just outlawed software patents? Call your representatives > >> please. It will take a lot of voices to drown out the voice from Microsoft, which as I > >> mentioned, now gets a lot of patent revenue from Android OEMs, who are not strong enough > >> to fight back. > > > > > > Yes, I thought about the header/dependency situation for SSL after your previous email. I understand your frustration, believe me! > > > > Perhaps Apple will stop suing people for making black boxes without their permission, or charging people for manufacturing a bluetooth device that is to connect to one of their devices too. But it'll never happen. The cogs will keep turning and we'll have to sort the crap out. > > > > With regards to the compiler situation; As much as I don't really appreciate MSVC, the execution speed differential of GCC (with -O2 optimisations) and MSVC compiled wxWidgets samples is incredible. MSVC wins by an order of magnitude, especially for start-up times. I wanted to investigate the ELF header information. Apparently GCC can be a bit overly verbose with regards to ELF information which can slow load times significantly. > > > > The code is relocatable. Maybe it has been prerelocated. >
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable Read about "relocations". > > > Anyway, I'm kind of glad to hear the scripting window is not uniquely broken on Windows builds. In that case, I can forget about fixing it before releasing scripting through KiCad-Winbuilder. So I can get on and release that ASAP then. :) > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Brian.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
