----- Original Message -----

> From: Dick Hollenbeck <[email protected]>
> To: Carl Poirier <[email protected]>
> Cc: KiCad Developers <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Github plugin.
> 
> On 10/01/2013 08:47 AM, Carl Poirier wrote:
>>  Hey I forgot to tell you yesterday that while moving the libs to GitHub, I 
> had to rename
>>  the "smd_crystal&oscillator" one since GitHub doesn't 
> allow the '&' character to be used.
>>  I called it "smd_crystal_and_oscillator", and thus it will fail 
> with any fp-lib-table
>>  based on the one I sent earlier, which was tailored to the converted local 
> files.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Quick poll:
> 
> What do folks think of *footprints* named like this?
> 
> 
>    SOT23_Transistor_BC846_Handsoldering_RevA_03Aug2010
> 
> 
> Attached is a revised fp-lib-table for GITHUB.  The nicknames are shorter, no 
> revisions or
> dates in them.
> 
> 
> BTW, I much prefer something like this:
> 
> 
> SOT23_Transistor_BC846_Handsoldering_RevA_03Aug2010_while_I_was_wearing_my_blue_shirt_after_lunch_where_we_ate_pizza
> 
> 


That sounds like a good idea.  I'm all burned out for the day so I can't think 
if there would be any advantage to component_package_.... rather than 
package_component_...  On the other hand, so long as there's an established 
naming scheme it will be possible to use key searches etc. to help users filter 
and wade through huge libraries in the future. I have a feeling some other 
metadata would also be useful such as any notes on compliance to specific 
standards and so on; this helps keep file names short by keeping the fine 
details elsewhere.

- Cirilo


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to