On 10/30/2013 3:23 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>
>> No objections from me.  I've already commented on this so I'm all for
>> it.  The folks that devised this naming convention may disagree.
>>
>> Wayne
> 
> In the interests of symmetry, and brevity, oh that grand old "column width 
> saving brevity"
> that is, I would have preferred KIPRJMOD for the project specific environment 
> variable.
> Especially since the user will basically never set this into his real 
> environment, so the
> need to keep this environment variable "pinned to KiCad" is zilch.
> 
> Imagine how nice the bottom table would look in the attached png, if the 
> variable was
> KIPRJMOD instead, and how much easier to remember it would be.

Will do.

> 
> 
> Dick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to