On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:57:56AM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > In the future, I suggest you refrain from using terms like "modern > programming practices" when trying to convince developers (at least this > developer anyway) that the change you are proposing is worthwhile. This > is an automatic red flag for me. It sounds like a bunch of marketing > hype rather than a well thought out technical argument. While I agree > std::xxxx is more readable than using namespaces, there is nothing > "modern" about writing readable code. Good coding practices have been > around since "good old days" of assembly and C. Over the last 25 years,
Practical example of 'modern programming practice' (implemented by boost and other)... FUNCTORS Really really unconvenient & ugly & a total waste of time in 90% of the cases. Really miss lambdas in C++ :P (they say they are adding them... I fear the result...) -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
