On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > I can fully understand that it is much easier for many users not to deal with > building boost library, but on the other hand - there are many others who do > not need a separate copy of boost just for KiCad. ... > I look forward to your opinions. I tested it with boost 1.54.0-3 (that is the > reason why I put such version as required in CMakeLists.txt) and gcc 4.8.2.
Adding the new option to omit the local boost re-build makes sense in all cases, as it can be defaulted to retain the present behaviour during testing. I have a build cycle of 75 minutes because of the Boost build, after a 'make clean', rather than the ten or so for kicad otehrwise. An alternative approach would be do add a make target between 'make clean' and nothing, which only 'cleans' out the non-Boost parts I suppose Is this patch as to omiting the local kicad build of boost, available via a 'git' branch, that I might test it? Thank you -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
