2014-04-04 19:24 GMT+02:00 Dick Hollenbeck <[email protected]>: > > > I am in the process of migrating my personal footprint an schematic part > libraries to > using A and C for pad/pin names. > > Away from 1 and 2. > > Other than the fact that I now have the burden of maintaining every footprint > and > schematic part object myself relating to all things diode, from now to > eternity, is this a > bad idea?
I might very well be a good idea -- same goes for transistors. But what would you do with a BAT54S? This is a three pin package with two diodes in series with a pin in between. One could still stick with numbers for all those doubtfull packages, but that could seem inconsisten to the user if we make this the new way in kicad. > It's now impossible for the zenor, tvs, diode, or whatever to get placed on > the board > incorrectly with this, is my thinking. (Assumes the footprint silkscreen is > idiot proof > with clear Cathode demarcation.) > > > Note also, that I frequently use the Eagle footprints to good effect, but I > typically > clone anything I'm using into my own libraries, with possible minor mods. > > > Dick > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
