On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:03:57PM -0600, Matthew Brigdan wrote: > A const member function in c++ is guaranteed not to alter the object > it belongs to when called. It does not have to return a constant > value, or anything like that. As far as I can tell, there is not > "casting away" of constness
Yes, the meaning of constness changed in C++, together with the introduction of the mutable keyword. I was confusion an old behaviour. The new const has more of a 'failsafe' meaning that a permission to optimize (like pure functions). Before: A const method can't change a member variable and can't allow the returned value(s) to change the object (even indirectly) Now: A const method can't change a member variable and can't allow the returned value(s) to change directly the object. Furthermore it can do whatever it wants with mutable members. Pretty ugly and IMHO an hack, but that's how it's specified. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
