On 05/08/2014 03:06 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:44:58PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >> Please include comparative benchmarks with your patch submission. If >> there's no >> appreciable performance hit, then you have a chance getting the patch >> accepted. > > Are we *really* interested in the performance of file read/write when > there are horrible things going on at each redraw? :P > > Seriously, document file I/O is usually the least performance sensitive > part for a desktop applicatio
If the guys maintaining the footprint libraries continue to be generous with their time we cannot foresee the eventual size of the footprint database. I think for the guy who does not trim down his fp-lib-table to an interesting subset, may soon be trying to load a lot of footprints, maybe even unknowingly. I do feel speed is important, but I am not sure how much slower the DOM parser may be, and that is why a measurement is a good thing. Are you having any luck with lisp on your pic? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
