(please correct me if I am communicating in a method that is not efficient. This is my first message to the mailing list)
I've gotten to truly enjoy KiCad. What a great piece of software. I am interested in donating money to CERN if the priority is on releasing stable builds. Before I do this, I'd like to understand: 1. what are your priorities regarding features (I see stability as a feature - so my priority would be dev and test members are focused on releasing a stable build. This may not be the case for CERN. So I'd like to gain your perspective). 2. who is accountable for selecting and meeting a build schedule for the stability feature? For example, if I donate what expectation should I have regarding time frame for stable release and who on the dev side feels awful when the stable release is not realized and will work extra hard to make it so? thank you. -- Kind regards, Margaret blog: http://bitknitting.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
