On 20.10.2014 17:25, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:47:54AM -0400, Carl Poirier wrote:
I feel like we wouldn't use the last digit much in a triplet number
because, IIRC, backporting of fixes is not planned. That being said, I
would also begin with at least 2.1, as Cirilo said.
However, I personally vote for numbering the versions a la MATLAB.
I am not a dev, I know, so my 0.002 cents on N.N numbering starting from 2.0
or 2.1 ...
How about an Ubuntu-ish scheme with year/month? e.g. 2015.01?
My 10e-6 cents...
Cheers,
Tom
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
