This sounds like a step up from what we're doing now. On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> wrote:
> There was a question asking how bugs are closed. > > https://answers.launchpad.net/kicad/+question/263366 > > I didn't have a good answer so I dug around a bit and found some > information on the Launchpad blog about the meaning of bug status tags. > > http://blog.launchpad.net/general/of-bugs-and-statuses > > I also changed the status of two bugs from "Fix Committed" to "Fix > Released" and the "Open Bug" count was reduced by two. Given the way we > have been handling bugs, it looks like none of bugs are ever fixed. > This is confusing for new developers and doesn't really make a lot of > sense. I am proposing that we change the way we handle bugs as follows: > > * Once a bug fix has been committed to the project branch it should be > tagged as "Fix Committed" as we have always done. > > * The bug report status should be changed to "Fix Released" once bug is > confirmed as fixed by someone other than the person that authored the > bug fix. I'm assuming bugs can be changed back to "New" if the > committed fix did not actually fix the bug but I haven't tried it yet. > > * For legacy bug fixes, if the "Fix Committed" date is over a month, it > can be changed to "Fix Released" even if the fix has not been confirmed > as long as there are no additional complaints after the committed fix. > > If anyone has any comments, please speak up. Once we have a consensus > on this, I will make it an official project policy. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
