IANAL... On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:42:24PM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > I’m not sure it fits all use cases I could think of, for example, > let’s think you’re a board assembler/manufacturer, and you setup > a site that accepts KiCad designs, and processes the files > automatically via scripting to send you a cost estimation, > and other information. > > Having SINTEF as AGPL could require them to publish their > website scripts?, or their processing scripts?
I do not think so since AGPL do not automatically extend over external scripts... > , it would be nice > by the way, since other assemblers could have the chance to > start doing the same, but… it’s probably an entry barrier for > this ti happen. > > opinions?, See these already answered related questions: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12165092/agpl-license-and-non-disclosed-user-scripts-like-blender-python-scripts http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/236184/do-i-need-to-publish-deployment-scripts-for-deploying-agpl-licensed-work-mongod bye -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. +------------------------+ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp