Hi, I'm cleaning up a bit in the codebase, and found that the ERC silently treats the ElectricPinType and TypeSheetLabel enums the same.
typedef enum { enum ElectricPinType {
NET_INPUT, PIN_INPUT,
NET_OUTPUT, PIN_OUTPUT,
NET_BIDI, PIN_BIDI,
NET_TRISTATE, PIN_TRISTATE,
NET_UNSPECIFIED, PIN_PASSIVE,
NET_TMAX /* Last value */ PIN_UNSPECIFIED,
} TypeSheetLabel; PIN_POWER_IN,
PIN_POWER_OUT,
PIN_OPENCOLLECTOR,
PIN_OPENEMITTER,
PIN_NC,
PIN_NMAX
};
I don't like this at all, because it depends on the enum definitions
being consistent (which they aren't, because PASSIVE != UNSPECIFIED),
but cleaning this up isn't straightforward either.
For just the ERC, it would be easy to map the label type to a pin type,
but I'm not sure that this is sufficient.
Can anyone who understands the ERC shed some light on this?
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
