In response to a message written on 08.06.2015, 14:37, from Lorenzo Marcantonio:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:15:39PM +0200, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
There is another way: don't use a pad to simulate a via. Letting vias
retain their nets (or - in case of footprints - follow the connectivity
starting from pads) is IMHO a way to fix this and many other issues
(thermal via fields, etc.)
The main problem is another way: the NPTH conflicts with the main pad;
I don't really care about the vias (since they don't harm DRC)
Maybe special-casing hole in the same module could be a solution, if you
trust people do to correct modules...
IMHO, there is no any obstacles, that NPTH pads can have some net, only last
wall is in peoples minds… ;)
--
Best Regards,
LordBlick
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
