Hi, On 13.09.2015 17:55, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
> I suppose that is talking about the implementation of va_start: address > of last+sizeof of last gives the starting point of the va_list (in the > 'correct' stack direction, obviously); am I correct? Indeed. The standard is written so va_* can be implemented without special handling in the compiler (so there is no need to implement intrinsic functions). > ... let me guess, a clang warning? No, hard error from VS 2015. MS generally don't accept nonconforming code if they can avoid it, because they'd be stuck supporting that code for years. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
