> On Nov 3, 2015, at 8:12 PM, timofonic timofonic <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> I'm just a lurker and still not started to contribute, but I have some ideas:
> 
> - Indian Institute of Technology Bombay: I see technological and educational 
> institutions as potential contributors at this stage of development. Indian 
> Institute of Technology Bombay developed the Oscad package and showed a very 
> good attitude towards collaboration, I think they must go to FOSSDEM and talk 
> very seriously about a long term collaboration plan.
> - Improving usability: I think UX should be taken under a very serious 
> objective analysis by an independent group to make KiCad more popular, 
> OpenUsability.org seems a good candidate. Old schoolers and some developers 
> might resist to change, but KiCad's UX is one of the things that still make 
> people uncomfortable to use it.
> - QUCS: It seems a great project with innovation in their core ideas. I think 
> there should be some collaboration. It seems there are issues about SPICE 
> models being copyrighted so they have to use script downloaders, this would 
> make a future KiCad library with all components available in SPICE/Verilog-A 
> a very hard challenge until solved.
> - Organization: Are there clear roles in KiCad? Wayne is the project manager 
> and there are translators, that's all I know. Are there main or specific 
> roles in the team? What about a fast voting process to take decisions? Are 
> there a formal meritocratic core team?
> - Wiki: What about using a wiki for documentation? It provides an easier to 
> use environment,  it can be customized for i18n and even parsing KiCad files 
> to show them  as SVG if someone writes a plugin for it. The documentation 
> could be exported and shipped in each release, too.

Let me add my input as a professional (does-it-for-a-living) EE with nearly 30 
years of experience. (Holy moly! How did that happen?)

Regarding integrating any kind of simulation tool into the mainline PCB design 
package, I suggest the following: DON’T BOTHER. Why? Because board design and 
circuit simulation are two different processes with different goals. Altium 
offers it, nobody uses it. 

The problem is that the things that you need to do a proper simulation are not 
relevant to layout. Assuming a SPICE engine, you need the simulation control 
cards, you need models for everything, and you need the stimulus. And then 
there are the things that you need to make a functioning circuit board that you 
can’t simulate. So you have to work out how to make things like connectors and 
such vanish from the simulation netlist, and you need to do the same for the 
stimulus sources and such from the layout netlist. Perhaps someone can explain 
how to use SPICE to simulate only the DAC output reconstruction filter or a mic 
preamp that is integrated in a design with the converters and a processor and 
other stuff, then maybe we can have this discussion.

And further: the world really doesn’t need another SPICE simulator. Every 
professional I know uses the free (as in beer) LTSpice. It runs on Windows, 
Macs and Linux. You can add third-party models. It really just does work. Is it 
Open Source? No. Does that matter? Only if you’re Richard Stallman. The rest of 
us have work to do. (There’s another free alternative for OS X users in 
MacSpice, which doesn’t have its own schematic editor.) What do I want? A 
robust PCB design package that can handle designs of any complexity and 
specialist design rules. Integrating a VHDL or SPICE simulator gets in the way 
of that. (Again, Altium: it has all of that extra crap that nobody uses and the 
users complain about bugs that go unfixed for years while Altium adds an 8051 
compiler.)

Regarding usability: Yes, of course usability is important. But who should 
determine how the user interface should be implemented? My vote is that people 
who’ve spent years in the trenches of board design are those whose ideas you 
want to capture. Sorry, newbies to PCB layout don’t get to tell the vets how 
the program should work. Harsh? Sure. My pals in the live sound business call 
it the Anvil Of Reality. There’s always some kid who thinks he can step up to a 
rig in a theatre and mix a show without having the experience of working the 
clubs. They always get told “no,” because the kids don’t know what they don’t 
know.

The other topics have been covered by Wayne and others.

-a
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to