Makes sense. There is already a link to the Developer's Documentation on the website so everything should be good to go.
Thanks, Wayne On 1/4/2016 9:49 AM, Mark Roszko wrote: > Yea I was going to trash the website copy of instructions. It's too > much of a pita to maintain separately. > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 1/4/2016 5:14 AM, David Godfrey wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tom, Maciej >>> >>> On 04/01/16 17:47, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >>>> Hi Tom, >>> >>>> Thank you for noticing, a pull request to correct this has already been >>>> sent. >>> >>>> BTW: I have just noticed we keep two documents describing the compiling >>>> process - on the website and in the source repository >>>> (Documentation/development/compiling.md). How about getting rid of the >>>> latter one? >>> Could I argue against removing the doc in the source. >>> If I need to work out how to compile something, I always use local docs >>> from the repository at (in theory) they should be correct for that exact >>> version of source. >>> >>> On the other hand, a version of the doc kept on a website is very likely >>> not correct for that version of source. >>> It can only present a single method that is correct for a given version. >>> (unless you want to complicate it with lots of [do this for ver:X but >>> not ver:Y] statements. >>> As (using git) I could decide to install branch "master" or go back in >>> time and install branch "0.6" it is likely that the web instructions >>> will be wrong for one or both methods, while the docs in the source tree >>> should be correct or close to correct at least. >>> >>> Regards >>> David G >> >> I would prefer that we maintain the compiling instructions as part of >> the developers documentation. @David's argument about version control >> is valid. As developers, we need to do a better job of keeping this up >> to date as the project changes. A better solution might be to link the >> compiling instructions in the developer's documentation on the website >> rather than maintain two separate versions. The developers docs get >> rebuilt every commit so they should always be up to date. This would >> probably work because the website only needs the current build instructions. >> >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Orson >>> >>>> On 12/30/2015 07:42 PM, Tom Andrews wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Just a quick one for the website, under the Linux build from source page, >>>>> the dependencies are missing packages: libglm-dev and >>> libcurl4-openssl-dev >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
