Hello Clemens, Clemens Koller writes: > Hello, Mathias! > > On 2016-01-12 21:29, Mathias Grimmberger wrote: > > Clemens Koller <[email protected]> writes: > >> Can you rebase your patch, please? > > > > Please find attached a patch done against rev 6455, I hope I put it all > > together correctly, especially the DRC clearance stuff. > > > > I also added the plot code for Gerber output. > > Thanks a lot. It applies nicely now! > > First feedback: It would be great to make the corner radius variable > instead of fixing it to 25% of the shorter pad edge and <=0.25mm. [1]
That can certainly be done. What do you think how it should work? I imagine the following: - optionally a radius can be given, <= 0 or not given means use default as above (I need to check how the file format handles optional values) - actual value used is clamped between 50% of shorter edge and some small value (a radius of 1 or 2 internal units might cause nasty numerical problems) - in the pad properties dialog the input field is empty by default for new pads Would the possibility to alternatively give the radius as a percentage of the shorter edge be useful? It would complicate things a bit though. MGri _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
