I like the behavior of this patch, it seems a lot closer to how I'd expect deleting wires to work. :)
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:49:09PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi jp, > > On 19.05.2016 19:44, jp charras wrote: > > > It could be worth to *clearly* explain in your patches what bug you want to > > fix, or what enhancement > > you are adding. > > Good point. > > The last batch has two goals: > > 1. fix a long-standing annoyance that deleting a line segment will > delete the entire length of wire, even when I want to delete only a > short piece. http://psi5.com/~geier/wires.ogv shows what I mean. > > 2. prepare for net ties -- these need to split nets, so having code in > place to split wires at certain points will have nice synergy effects. > > For the most part, I've been posting these as a heads-up and RFC; if the > benefit is obvious, it's fine to apply them, but I'm not unhappy if they > aren't applied immediately, because I'm more interested in things that > are obviously wrong or that I've overlooked, and my patch stack is > rebased on top of the current state every time I update anyway. > > "Serious" patch submissions start with a [PATCH 00/nn] mail that doesn't > contain a patch and explains the rationale fully, and have longer > descriptions in each separate patch (and incidentally, it'd be nice to > keep those somehow). > > Simon > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
