Since there has been no objections against this policy change, I committed this patch. Thanks.
On 9/7/2016 8:09 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Wayne, > > I attach a patch updating the UI policy. I would rather you commit the > patch, to be sure you agree with the changes. > > Regards, > Orson > > On 09/03/2016 02:17 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> We've been dancing around this issue for a while without any real >> resolution. I'm fine with using Mark's version of wxFB but a lot folks >> are going to want to use whatever is packaged for their distro rather >> than build wxFB from source which presents a serious issue. I'm not >> sure there is a good answer for this problem. If no one else has any >> objections, I'm willing to make Mark's wxFB fork the official version >> for KiCad dialog submission for the time being. In the long run, if >> wxFB is not actively being developed, I would rather come up with an >> alternative. >> >> FWIW, I think most of you know how I feel about dialog creation tools >> vs. creating them programmatically. Kicad's dialogs used to be created >> this way but I got out voted at the time the decision was made to switch >> to wxFB. I'm feeling better about my choice all the time. ;) >> >> On 9/2/2016 7:11 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: >>> I would vote in favor of using Mark's fork officially for everyone, if >>> it builds okay on all the platforms. wxfb is kinda nasty, if we're going >>> to use it it's nice to have our own fork that solves at least a few of >>> these issues. >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:45:12AM +1000, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: >>>> I just use MRoszko's fork; it's cleaner than the original and much >>>> easier to configure and build since the bizarre wxFB build system >>>> had been eradicated and replaced by CMake. >>>> >>>> git clone https://github.com/marekr/wxFormBuilder.git wxfb >>>> cd wxfb && git checkout wxFB3.5-1 >>>> >>>> A half year or so ago I tried the later wxFB in development but it >>>> broke so many things that I just reverted the files and went back to >>>> wxFB3,5-1. >>>> >>>> - Cirilo >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Chris Pavlina <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Along these lines: this isn't the first time wxfb version issues have >>>>> come up. Perhaps we should pick an "official" wxfb version for the >>>>> project to use, and then actually provide builds of it for developer use >>>>> (as it can be a bit annoying to track down a specific version)? Then we >>>>> can upgrade together as new versions come out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 09:16:41AM +1200, Simon Wells wrote: >>>>>> dialog_pad_properties_base.fbp h cpp was last modified in commit >>>>>> >>>>>> 63decd70e6ab1bf2fe95db3f426f6cdfc79be213 >>>>>> https://git.launchpad.net/kicad/commit/?id= >>>>> 63decd70e6ab1bf2fe95db3f426f6cdfc79be213 >>>>>> >>>>>> the problem is this version of wxformbuilder is newer than the one >>>>>> available on sourceforge and it is very difficult to build on other >>>>>> platforms ( i tried a while ago and gave up as it had issues) >>>>>> >>>>>> the version that was used to save these files has broken it on older >>>>>> versions of wxformbuilder >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a version of wxformbuilder that we should be using to avoid >>>>>> it breaking on other versions? >>>>>> >>>>>> the last available from sf.net is 3.5rc1 iirc >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Simon > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
