On 10/12/2016 10:07 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
> 
> Thanks, good to know! For this issue, it's important to have separate
> flags for inclusion in PCB netlist and Spice netlist, but maybe that's
> already the plan?

It is.

> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jonaton,
>>
>> Since you are new to the list, you have missed the discussion about the
>> new schematic file format.  New flags are going to bet added for taggind
>> schematic symbols as not in netlist and/or not in BOM.  Adding this as a
>> field will get lost in the new file format.  The new file format is
>> currently under development so adding this now doesn't make a lot of sense.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On 10/12/2016 9:57 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
>>> Hi list, I'm new here and quite new to Kicad. I'm actually a software
>>> developer but doing hobby DIY electronics as well. That's my little
>>> presentation, now on to the topic:
>>>
>>> See https://forum.kicad.info/t/simulator-vs-pcb/4219/8
>>>
>>> What do you think? Perhaps it would make sense to add a
>>> "PCB_Netlist_Enabled" field (defaults to Y if no such field), similar
>>> to the now existing "Spice_Netlist_Enabled"? Spice-specific symbols
>>> like voltage sources can then have this field pre-filled in the symbol
>>> library. And users can add it themselves for other components specific
>>> to simulation, like dummy load resistors etc.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to