+1 this is a really good idea. A further enhancement would be the ability to access this data from Eeschema such that BoMs can be created that exclude THT or virtual parts.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/14/2016 3:21 PM, jp charras wrote: > > Le 14/12/2016 à 20:51, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > >> Can we rename "Normal" and "Normal+Insert" to "THT" and "SMT", or > >> "Through hole" and "Surface mount", or something similarly descriptive? > >> I *still* have to mouse over for the tooltip to remember which is > >> which... > >> > > > > I agree. > > But do not use short names. > > > > "Through hole component" and "Surface mount component", or something > similar is better, because too > > short names are *really* hard to translate. > > > > This change makes sense to me. I agree with the using the full names > rather than the abbreviations. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
