On 13 January 2017 at 13:35, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ithink using separate fields > would be cleaner and more reliable in the long run. > Yes, I am coming over to this point of view. I just quite liked the compactness and clarity of the initial proposal but it might not be a good trade-off to make in this instance. I think people tend to overcomplicate things a bit. These are just some fields names that we all use but call different things. After a few weeks I will make a final document. It would be nice to put up on kicad-pcb.org somewhere to link to when people ask about it suggested field names to use as defaults in their application. On 13 January 2017 at 14:02, Clemens Koller <c...@embeon.de> wrote: > I am not sure how far you would go with KiCAD here and it's libraries. I am not proposing to add anything to KiCAD at this point. Simply to make a document that describes "standard" field names that the community has agreed on. People can chose to use the standard if they wish.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : email@example.com Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp