Fair enough. Has coroutine really been as bad as context though? Seems we've had to resort to using some internal API functions in context, which really seems to be screwing us over.. :P
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:27:59PM +0100, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 23.02.2017 14:17, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > boost::coroutine? Seems the latter has a much more stable API, is > > it missing something we require? > > Hi Chris, > > I can't agree that either boost::context or boost::coroutine have stable > APIs, that's why have our own wrapper on top... > > Cheers, > Tom _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
