2017-03-09 0:03 GMT+01:00 Oliver Walters <[email protected]>: >> Doesn't that just depend on how big and how many libs are specied in >> the pro file? This is of course project specific. > > > Yes, but I can do a direct comparison, opening the same project with an > older build and a newer build, and get glaringly different results in terms > of loading speed. >
I know don't try to convince me. That comment was a reply to Chris' observation, I quote: "Funny enough it doesn't seem to happen for all projects for me." > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Nick Østergaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 2017-03-08 23:52 GMT+01:00 Chris Pavlina <[email protected]>: >> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:46:54AM +1100, Oliver Walters wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Slow? I have noticed that the library loading slowness appeared with >> >> > the new IO manager thing. Although I don't have any proff to quanify >> >> > that. >> >> >> >> >> >> I can also attest that (at least on Windows) the more recently >> >> nightlies >> >> (corresponding to the new IO plugin, approximately) take ~10s to load a >> >> library set that was previously < 1s. >> >> >> >> Once the libraries are loaded, eeschema takes an additional length of >> >> time >> >> (~10s) to open, whereas previously it opened "instantly" >> > >> > I've noticed this too. Funny enough it doesn't seem to happen for all >> > projects for me. I wonder if it's something only being done sometimes, >> > or a polynomial time explosion. >> > >> > Either way someone needs to point the business end of a profiler at the >> > library loader. >> > >> >> Doesn't that just depend on how big and how many libs are specied in >> the pro file? This is of course project specific. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Nick Østergaard <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > 2017-03-08 22:33 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh <[email protected]>: >> >> > > On 3/8/2017 4:08 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: >> >> > >> That's why I submitted such a trivial patch to the list first, I >> >> > >> figured >> >> > >> someone would say something ;) >> >> > >> >> >> > >> It does make sense to me, because the GUI is blocked. The busy >> >> > >> cursor >> >> > >> says to me "yes, the GUI is supposed to be blocked right now, it's >> >> > >> not >> >> > >> frozen". Even with a progress bar, it can seem unresponsive - >> >> > >> particularly if 1) the progress bar ends up obscured, as can >> >> > >> happen with >> >> > >> 'weird' window managers sometimes, or 2) if a single library takes >> >> > >> a >> >> > >> particularly long time to load, which I'm sure will only get worse >> >> > >> if we >> >> > >> eventually allow loading them over the internet like for footprint >> >> > >> libs. >> >> > > >> >> > > It's the old belt and suspender method. Users have got to quit >> >> > > using >> >> > > those 'weird' window managers. It causes way too much grief. I'm >> >> > > surprised that a single library load takes long enough to need a >> >> > > busy >> >> > > cursor but I'm not opposed to the patch. Does the progress bar in >> >> > > wxWidgets have a continuous mode? That doesn't solve the hidden >> >> > > progress window issue though. >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > I like the non-continous mode. >> >> > >> >> > Slow? I have noticed that the library loading slowness appeared with >> >> > the new IO manager thing. Although I don't have any proff to quanify >> >> > that. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> >> > >>> Does showing a progress dialog and a busy cursor at the same time >> >> > >>> make >> >> > >>> sense? >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> On 3/8/2017 3:36 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: >> >> > >>>> Hi, >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> This patch enables display of the "busy" cursor while schematic >> >> > >>>> libraries are being loaded. Tested on Linux, Windows 10, and >> >> > >>>> macOS >> >> > >>>> 10.12. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> > >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > >>>> Post to : [email protected] >> >> > >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> > >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > >>> Post to : [email protected] >> >> > >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ >> >> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > > Post to : [email protected] >> >> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > Post to : [email protected] >> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
