Definitely faster - tolerably so, I'd say, maybe 1.5 seconds or so to load all the libraries in my largest projects.
Not faster than stable though :( Thank you. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:31:08PM +0100, jp charras wrote: > Le 09/03/2017 à 21:11, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:01:44PM +0100, jp charras wrote: > >> Le 09/03/2017 à 20:31, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > >>> It's faster for me now - about five seconds to load an empty schematic > >>> project with all the official libs, which is bearable, and about the > >>> same time to load a large multipage schematic with a smaller library > >>> set. > >>> > >>> Can we declare a verdict on whether the busy cursor is welcome still? I > >>> feel like five seconds is still long enough to warrant one. > > Should be faster now (commit de30dc9f5df92d6d7ce3743883551f64aecc989e > speed up libraries loading). > > Due to a few optimizations, large multipage schematics loading should be now > perhaps faster than > stable release. > > I am not sure the busy cursor is now still needed. > > > -- > Jean-Pierre CHARRAS > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
