Mean less unconnected. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Heikki Pulkkinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, do not know that. There are lots of connections witch are not middle > of via or pad. That would be explanation of that master version has more > unconnected items. > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:05 PM, jp charras <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 19/11/2017 à 16:18, Heikki Pulkkinen a écrit : >> > Hi, >> > >> > You can dowload it from: >> > >> > https://forum.kicad.info/t/testbench-board-for-kicad/1127 >> > >> > I do some more test, and found that new algo would be very fast with my >> parallell zone filling algo, >> > but it get stuck after filled all 128 pours below 10 seconds and >> started to removing insulated >> > areas. Other boards just works fine. Maybe it is too good to be true to >> get results like that. >> > >> > Rgards >> > >> > Heikki >> > >> >> I made a test with this board (on W7 32 bits): >> Refill zones: >> stable version: 10s >> master (current) version: 3m >> >> but there are less unconnected items in master version >> (and the master version ran out of memory once) >> >> I am not sure this board was made with Kicad. >> >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski < >> [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > >> > > Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm >> is slow >> > > with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that new algo is >> > > speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and >> > > dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And >> that >> > > board is just nothing big. >> > > >> > > Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3 >> mins. >> > > New one almost 17 minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in >> zone >> > > filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and >> most of >> > > the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Heikki, >> > >> > Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in >> > performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if >> possible! >> > >> > Best, >> > Tom >> > >> > PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC? >> > >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
