I haven't had any complaints yet, just want to make sure everyone knows there is basically only one way you can do it that works well.
On Dec 4, 2017 13:21, "Maciej Suminski" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I suppose I am the main wrestler and as far as I can tell, > wxDataViewCtrl tree works very differently on each platform. I tried to > implement dynamic updates, then have jumped through numerous > wxRingsOfFire and in the end I have returned to your approach. It should > works as fast as in the original version, but I will try to run it on > OSX soon. > > Have you already received complaints about the OSX performance? Today I > pushed a patch that fixed a significant performance issue on Windows. > > Cheers, > Orson > > On 12/04/2017 06:48 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > Hey, just a comment because I see people are wrestling with > > COMPONENT_TREE performance as I did when writing it. TEST ON MACOS. The > > performance of the widget there has a really different profile from on > > other systems. I had to do things in really unobvious ways to make it > > perform reasonably there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
