2018-02-25 23:29 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com>: > Stephen, > > I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library. This will > probably be acceptable up to the stable release. At this point we will > have to tag each repo. Are any of our library devs planning on doing any > major reorganization of the libraries between now and the stable release? > If so, than we may want to tag the library repos for rc1. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > On 02/25/2018 09:43 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > >> Now that 5.0.0-rc1 is out, I'd like to ask how this should be packaged. >> >> In particular, I'm using Fedora, and my private builds are built based on >> the mechanisms from the "fedora-packaging" repo on github. However, the >> "fedora-packaging" repo still pulls in the "kicad-libraries" repo from >> kicad 4. I think that should probably change at this point. >> >> In my private version of "fedora-packaging", I've removed the >> "kicad-libraries" repo from the build, and added the "kicad-symbols" and >> "kicad-footprints" repos to the build. >> > > Don't forget kicad-templates and kicad-packages3d. > > >> Are there plans to update the official "fedora-packaging" repo along >> similar lines, and if so, is there someone I might work with on that? >> Also, do packaging discussions happen on this mailing list or on a >> different list? >> > > I would think so. I know the debian distro packaging is going to be this > way. Would one of our fedora package devs care to comment on this? >
I thought I alread did by replying earlier. But I see now that my inline comment did not really answer that question explicitly. I want to keep it update, but upstream fedora packagers have been unresponsive for the kicad package last time. I guess they were just busy. IMHO it is best to have the package scripts converge a bit more. But please send patches to the scripts such that we can get the nighlies updated and tested properly. > > >> One final question - does the kicad team guide package development on >> each of the various distros, or is it up to each distro owner to sort out >> how to best package the project for their distro? >> > > We leave this up to the distro package devs as much as possible. KiCad > doesn't try to dictate how it should be packaged. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > > >> I don't want to step on any toes - I just want to help if possible. >> >> Steve >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp