Yes. https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-winbuilder/issues/53
It does basically work that way, but simply needs a bit of refactoring on the build server to support both mechanisms, but as getting 5.0.0 has been a priority have not not done it yet. Nick Den ons. 1. aug. 2018 kl. 15.32 skrev Ben Hest <bombledm...@gmail.com>: > Hi, In trying to get KiCad 5 installed in a [locked down] corporate > environment we ran into an issue. We came upon a limitation of installer > size for our installation management platform and, while it ends up being > our issue to own internally, it did bring up a discussion. Is there any > interest for the packagers to put out an installer without 3d models > included or some other possible similar solution? The current installer > payload is sitting at exactly 1GB which is arguably a bit heavy even in > today high speed internet world, especially considering the 4.xx series > installers were just a bit north of 100MB. Other CAD programs offer a > split "light" installer along with a complete installer to accommodate a > variety of needs, but there might be other ideas for accommodating that as > well. > > As a secondary note... Above, the primary concern is installer.exe size, > but I also noticed the installer dialog doesn't allow one to avoid > installing the 4.3GB of 3d models while it does give options for the > footprints and symbols which total about 80MB. > [image: image.png] > > -- > > -Ben > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp