Hi Wayne,
> On 18 Sep 2018, at 23:20, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/18/2018 7:20 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
>> When calculating obstacles we currently use the diff-pair gap as a
>> clearance between a diff-pair trace and a diff-pair pad.
>>
>> I’m pretty sure that’s wrong. I’m just not sure how wrong.
>>
>> I suspect the diff-pair gap shouldn’t be used as a clearance /at all/.
>> It’s the gap between the traces, not a clearance.
>
> Why wouldn't you use the netclass clearance or the default netclass
> clearance if a netclass is not defined? It seems to me that the gap has
> nothing to do with the clearances other than the gap between the diff
> pair traces.
Yes, that is indeed our conclusion. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t
missing anything as the code was using the gap as a clearance.
Cheers,
Jeff.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp