This makes sense to me. Wayne
On 3/8/19 11:51 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 08/03/2019 à 17:43, Carsten Schoenert a écrit : >> Hi *, >> >> Am 27.01.19 um 19:55 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: >> >>> I suppose I could remove the CC-BY-SA-4.0 metadata license but I'm not >>> sure it makes sense to put the demos under the gpl3+ license. Maybe we >>> should add the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to the demo folder or the main >>> folder with a note that the demos fall under the this license. JP, you >>> created most (all?) of the demos. Do you have any opinion on this? >> >> as nothing did really happen on this I want to poke this topic again. >> >> How to proceed regrading the raised license question by Wayne? >> > > I think the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license is perfect for the demo folder files. > The gpl license makes sense for code, but not really for these demo files. > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
